For founders

Find out how a fund will read you.

A partner spends four minutes on your deck and decides. This shows you what those four minutes surface — what checks out, what doesn't, and which funds you actually fit — before you spend a warm introduction finding out.

Check my company See what you get

5 researches per pack · No subscription · Your data is never shown to a fund unless you send it

Your company
Scored against live investment theses
64
conviction medium
Seed fund · deep tech 78 · fit
Sector accelerator 71 · fit
Generalist Series A 42 · early
Consumer-only fund 19 · off

Illustrative. Real scores come from your own submission.

What comes back

Not a score. The reasoning behind it.

The same memo a partner reads on the other side of this platform — every claim checked against public sources, every number traced back to where it came from.

What you can prove

Every claim in your deck is checked against what's publicly findable, and comes back marked verified, unverified or contradicted. The contradicted ones are what cost you meetings — and you usually don't know they're there.

Which funds you fit

Scored against real investment theses — stage, sector, cheque size, and what a fund actually backs rather than what its website says. Being a 19 at the wrong fund is useful information.

What to fix, in order

Specific and ranked by how much each one moves the score — not "improve traction", but the reference call, the number, or the claim that needs evidence behind it.

What a fix list looks like
  1. One claim is contradicted by a public source. Your deck implies a regulatory approval is underway; the public register doesn't show it. This caps conviction on its own — fix the wording or get the evidence.
  2. Two of your three headline numbers have no source. Name the period and the basis for each, or a partner discounts all three.
  3. No reference a fund can call. One named customer willing to take a call moves traction more than another slide.

Three ways in. Same result.

Whichever you already have — a deck, a website, or an AI assistant you already talk to.

1

Upload the deck

The one you already send. We read it, structure it, and ask only about what's genuinely missing.

2

Point us at your site

No deck yet? A URL and a few sentences is enough to start — the research fills in most of the rest.

3

Connect your assistant

Add our connector to Claude or any MCP client. It interviews you, drafts the application, and submits it for you.

# Point your AI assistant at us. Nothing to install.
Read https://pitchinfra.com/founders/skill.md

# It reads your deck, asks what's missing, and submits.
✓ Researches your company against public sources
✓ Scores you against real investment theses
✓ Comes back with the ranked fix list
What's included

Pay once. Run it again after you fix things.

Research costs real money to run, so this isn't free — but it isn't a subscription either. A pack of 5 covers you through several rounds of fixing and re-checking, which is how it actually gets used.

What a pack costs is shown when you create your account — there's nothing to pay to get that far.

Every research gives you
Full research memo, the same one a fund reads
Verified / unverified / contradicted on every claim
Scores against multiple investment theses
The ranked fix list, rewritten each run
A shareable link you control
Score well and you can send it straight to funds on the platform that fit — with your permission, never automatically.
Start

It takes about ten minutes

Tell us about the company, confirm your email, and the research runs. You get the memo back on a page that is yours — nothing is shared with any fund unless you send it.

Check my company

Or point your AI assistant at https://pitchinfra.com/founders/check/skill.md and let it apply for you.

Running a fund, not raising for one?

The other side of this platform reads every application that reaches you, checks it, and scores it against your own thesis.

See the fund side